A fiery dialogue from the recent film Pushpa-2 — “Rappa Rappa” — has now become the hottest phrase in Andhra Pradesh politics. But it’s not being used to discuss development or governance. Instead, it’s sparking debate over political rhetoric and the limits of free speech.
During his recent visit to Rentapalla in Palnadu district, former CM Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy was seen endorsing a placard carried by a supporter that read: “Rappa Rappa narukutham” (we’ll hack them down). Cases were reportedly filed against the supporter. But what raised eyebrows further was Jagan himself later using the same phrase in two or three public interactions.
In a press conference held Wednesday, Jagan gave a strong warning to the TDP and its supporters, reiterating the “Rappa Rappa” line. He questioned why dialogues popular in movies can’t be used in real life. “If we like the line in films, why not in reality?” he asked, even questioning why the censor board allows such content if it’s problematic elsewhere.
While this line of reasoning may find favor with fans, legal and political analysts caution otherwise. Leaders holding influential positions — especially current or former Chief Ministers — are expected to maintain restraint in public remarks. The Indian Penal Code, and now the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, clearly outlines boundaries for speech.
Section 351(2) of the BNS criminalizes threats made with the intent to cause harm or fear. Punishment can include up to seven years of imprisonment, a fine, or both. Additionally, Section 152 addresses incitement of violence that disrupts peace or national integrity, making such statements even more serious.
So while the dialogue may light up the screen, using it in real-life political discourse — especially with a violent undertone — is legally and ethically problematic. Analysts argue that all leaders, whether from YSRCP, TDP, or Jana Sena, must think before they speak.
Many netizens felt that instead of defending the “Rappa Rappa” line, Jagan could have condemned it — setting a more responsible example for political conduct.
